## Archive for the ‘Macro’ Category

### Photography formulas – Macro

Thursday, February 10th, 2011 by

Recently I was doing some research regarding calculations for close-focus photography. Since I didn’t come across a place that collected all the relevant formulas (aside from a few forum posts), I thought I’d compile them a bit.

$F$: Focal length
$X$: Extension
$D$: Focused distance (measured from the lens nodal point)
$P$: Focused distance (measured from the film plane)
$M$: Magnification
$B$: Bellows factor
$O$: Object size
$I$: Image size (size of $O$ on film)

##### Focal length, extension and distance

First, the relationship between focal length, extension and distance. Extension is how far the nodal point of the lens is from the film plane. Note that this is at least the focal length of the lens1. An extension of $F$ gives you infinity focus, more extension gets you closer.

$\frac{1}{F} = \frac{1}{X} + \frac{1}{D}$

##### Magnification

Magnification is the relationship between the size of the subject, and the size it will be on film. With a magnification of 1, a 10mm subject will be 10mm on the film. Note that for macro lenses, magnification is often given in the form 1:(1/M), so a magnification of 0.5 would be 1:2, and life-size would be 1:1. magnifications bigger than 1 will have the bigger number in front, so a magnification of 2 would be 2:1.

$M = \frac{X}{F} - 1 = \frac{F}{D-F} = \frac{I}{O}$

Note that you can invert this to find how small an item you can photograph with a given magnification. Using a 1:2 lens on 35mm film will allow you to photograph a scene of 72mm wide and 48mm high, for example.

##### Bellows factor

Bellows factor determines how much extra exposure is needed when photographing close to the camera2. Multiply the normal’ exposure of the scene by the bellows factor to get the correct exposure.

$B = (\frac{X}{F})^2 = (\frac{I}{O} + 1)^2 = (M + 1)^2$

Note that this only applies if you are using a camera without TTL metering. A TTL meter will automatically correct for this.

##### Some examples

Say I have a 135mm lens, that normally focusses down to 0.9 meters from the lens. The maximum magnification is then:

$M = \frac{F}{D-F} = \frac{135}{900-135} = \frac{135}{765} = 0.18$

I can calculate the lens extension at closest focus:

$\frac{1}{X} = \frac{1}{F} - \frac{1}{D} = \frac{1}{135} - \frac{1}{900} = \frac{1}{159} \Rightarrow X = 159$

If I add a 25mm extension ring between the lens and the camera, I can calculate the new magnification at infinity:

$M = \frac{X}{F} - 1 = \frac{135 + 25}{135} - 1 = 0.19$

And the new magnification at closest focus:

$M = \frac{X}{F} - 1 = \frac{159 + 25}{135} - 1 = 0.36$

So with the extension ring, the lens becomes capable of roughly 1:3 macro.

If I were using a camera without TTL metering, I’d have to calculate the new exposure:

$B = (M + 1)^2 = 1.36^2 = 1.85$

So I’d have to add about two-thirds of a stop to the exposure my meter sees in order to get a correctly exposed picture.

Without the macro ring, at closest focus the bellows factor would be:

$B = (\frac{X}{F})^2 = (\frac{159}{135})^2 = 1.39$

Which would be roughly one-third of a stop.

You can see that bellows factor doesn’t really become an issue until you get at 1:2 magnification or greater, from which point is increases very quickly.

It’s worth to note that the distance scales on most lenses indicate distance from the film plane, not from the focal point of the lens. This makes the calculations a lot more complex, as

$P = D + X$

which converts the first formula above to:

$\frac{1}{F} = \frac{1}{X} + \frac{1}{P - X}$

Imagine the lens mentioned above doen’t focus 0.9 meters from the lens, but from the film plane. It’s now not as easy to determine X. Rewriting the formula above, we get a quadratic formula:

$-X^2 + PX - FP = 0$

which our math teacher taught us means that:

$X = \frac{-P \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4 \cdot -1 \cdot -FP}}{-2}$

And thus:

$X = 165$

from there on, we can use the formulas above to determine magnification, bellows factor and everything else as normal.

Note that the quadratic formula also gives us

$X = 735$

which is another extension that would give a subject to film-plane distance of 0.9 meters, though that would take us very solidly into macro territory, with a magnification of:

$M = \frac{X}{F} - 1 = \frac{735}{135} - 1 = 4.44$

In other words: Well over four times life-size, and the exact reciprocal of the magnification at 165mm.
This is logical, since

$735 = 900 - 165$

This is simply the entire optical system reversed, with the subject and film switching places.

1. Telephoto and retrofocus lens designs can be shorter or longer than their own focal length, but they cast’ a nodal point outside (or behind) themselves, as it were []
2. Due to the inverse square law, the further you rack out your lens, the less light hits the film/sensor []

### SOOKY-M manual

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009 by

Just a quick note: As I already stated on my lenses page, one thing that bugged me when I was looking into the SOOKY-M (SOMKY) device, was the distinct lack of info available online. I’ve therefore made the manual available as a download.

### SOOKY-M

Friday, November 13th, 2009 by

As I mentioned back when I explained the lens I’m using for the Leica Lessons project, I was really tempted by the Dual-range Summicron. In the end I decided against it, but mentioned in the footnotes that if I would end up missing the close range too much, I could always get a SOMKY adapter.

Well, I just did.

I love using the Leica, and it does pretty much everything I want from a camera. I’m surprised at how little I miss my Canons, quite frankly1, but one thing keeps bugging me: The lack of close focus. Product shots, and of course flower photography are hard or impossible without excessive cropping, so in the end I caved.

I managed to find one in excellent condition, with manual2 and in the original red box. I’ll be testing it out over the coming period, and keep you posted. I already posted some info on the lenses page.

1. Which bothers me a bit, as I have quite a bit invested in that system. []
2. Which was pretty important, as there is frightingly little info on this device available online. []

### Flowers

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009 by

Another subject I like to photograph is flowers1. Catching the intricate detail and the magnificent colours on Velvia is a very relaxing experience in my opinion, and a good way to waste a day when on holiday in spring.

Please note that I am not a biologist, and have no clue whatsoever what kind of flower this is, nor do I really care2.

##### Technical details

Shot on Velvia 100, with Canon 30 and Olympus 50mm 1.8 on Panagor Macro converter3.

Interesting tidbit: Camera was upside down beneath my tripod to take this one4. That’s why a good tripod matters, it gets you into corners that would be impossible without.

##### Why I like it

Nothing special, just came out the way I envisioned it.

(Click on the image to see a larger version)

1. As another weblogger likes to call it: Flower pr0n! []
2. As the Bard wrote: Would a rose, by any other name, (or its own name for that matter) smell any less sweet? []
3. Spending a day on holiday with this (borrowed) combination led me to buying the Canon 50mm macro and LSC. []
4. This is actually the first photo on this site shot with a tripod. I finally did justice to the name! []