Author Archive

Cat silhouettes

Saturday, October 10th, 2009 by


One of the `real’ pictures from the first self-developed rolls. The cats loved the sunny spot between the screen and the kitchen window.

Technical details

Leica M3, 50mm Summicron, Neopan 400, Rodinal 1+45 (11 minutes).

Why I like it

I managed to get on film what I wanted to get when I pressed the shutter…

Well said

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009 by

DPReview1 just put up their hands-on preview of the Leica X1. The following line made me laugh out loud, but is also indicative of one of the reasons I prefer film over digital:

…if you’re after an aquarium mode, HD movies or background music for your slide shows, you’ll need to look elsewhere.

Back to our regular programming…

  1. Once referred to as …the place to go if you’ve just hit someone over the head and stolen their nice digital camera, and now need to read a review that’s comprehensive enough that you won’t miss the manual. (source). []

Further developments ((Worst pun ever, I know.))

Monday, October 5th, 2009 by


I recently went over my expenses for the Leica Year, and my development costs were rapidly approaching the cost of the Leica and lens. This was of course to be expected (and pointed out by Mike in the discussion following his original post, but the turning point was coming quicker than I expected.

Part of this is due to the fact that my lab charges more for B&W development than they do for colour (slide) development. (Or their contact sheets are very expensive). Costs run to over 10 EUR per roll. At over 2 rolls a week on average, that gets to over 100 EUR a month.

Luckily, when I chose my film, I went for a classic B&W film, so I dug up my parents’ old developing equipment and ordered some chemicals. This weekend, I developed my first few rolls. It was easier than I expected.

I used Agfa Rodinal, since it’s very cheap1 and lasts forever (reportedly). I used a 1+45 dilution2 and developed for 11 minutes, with 30 seconds agitation every 3 minutes. Followed by a water stop-bath and 6 minutes in RXA fixer (rapid, non hardening). Temperature was around 19 degrees, which is the temperature of the tapwater in my kitchen3.

I also caught up with my scanning this weekend, so from now on, I can develop and scan each roll in a reasonable time. Who needs digital?

  1. The `try the cheapest, upgrade if necessary’ tactic worked well for my film, so I applied it here as well. []
  2. I wanted something around 1+50 and my tank (Jobo 2400) has a 450ml capacity, so 450ml water + 10ml concentrate is easy to measure off, giving great reproducability. []
  3. Once again, taking the easy way out. []

Seeing the light

Thursday, October 1st, 2009 by

It’s funny how you know things, yet don’t really acknowledge them.

I’ve always known that human vision is tremendously adaptive. Dark scenes, light scenes, red light, green light. See it for a few seconds and the brain/eye combo applies the correct filters, switches to the right aperture, and presto: Well exposed image with a good white balance.

Sadly, cameras suck at this.

By now, I’ve got the colour problem pretty well under control, and know when to adjust my WB/filter my lens, and when to gel my flash. With B&W this problem isn’t even there.

The light problem is trickier though. I’m finding that guessing the exposure in low light scenes is much more difficult than in well-lit scenes1. Especially once you get below EV 6, light levels drop fast, while the eye keeps up perfectly.

Recently, with the days growing shorter and the weather turning worse, I’ve had more evening indoor scenes, and often noticed that I was overestimating the light2. I’ve now come in the habit of taking my first guess and then deducting another two stops. Haven’t had any films back though (more on that soon), so I maybe I’ll just end up with overexposed and blurred shots.

  1. For reference: I’m counting EV 10 to 16 as well-lit, anything lower as low light. []
  2. I’ve noticed this when other photographers (who didn’t read Mike Johnston, and thus were using normal equipment) were also present, and I cheated by looking at their exposure values. Naughty me []

Contact form

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009 by

As you may have noticed, I’ve added a contact page to the site. If you have any questions, suggestions or comments that don’t apply to any specific post or picture, feel free to use it.

Ben in window

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009 by


Well, finally back home, scanned about half of the back-log of rolls this weekend, so I can finally add some pictures.

This is Ben, one of our cats. He’s about one year old now.

Technical details

Shot with the Leica, of course. As you can see from the emphasized grain, the photo was slightly underexposed, but once again I was saved by the large dynamic range.

Why I like it

Because it’s a good, well focussed portrait of a cat. As anyone who’s ever photographed cats knows, it brings along its own difficulties. Taking a picture of a cat isn’t hard, if you don’t mind your subject being either a) sleeping, b) motion-blurred or c) not looking at you. Getting one to look at you and sit still for long enough to take a picture takes either hypnosis, skill or luck1. In this case, it was mostly the last.

  1. I’m not counting taxidermy, that’s just cheating. []

Filter factors

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009 by

Sorry for the recent draught in updates. I haven’t been home a lot, and as such haven’t had time to scan any pictures. I’ve shot plenty though.

To compensate for the lack of imagery, a bit of text today.

I’m by now not half-bad at guessing exposure with the M3, and when I’m wrong, I’m usually at least close enough that the exposure latitude of the negative can give me an acceptable picture. One thing is really throwing me though: Filters.

I’ve been experimenting a bit with differently coloured filters, and this has led to a lot of overexposure. This is mostly caused by trusting the filter factor of the filter.

Example: I’m trying to accentuate something in a picture, say, a red flower, so I take out my red filter1. The flower is in direct sunlight, so I set 1/500th of a second at f16 to start with. The filter has a 5x filter factor, so I lower my shutter speed to say, 1/125th (or open up to f8).
Result: well exposed background, over-exposed flower.

Why?2.
The filter doesn’t do much for its own colour, yet blocks its complementary colours. So the filter factor is in fact mostly applicable for colours other than the filter colour.

The right way to do it would be to maybe open up one stop from the base exposure, to highlight the primary subject. For lower filter factors, don’t open up at all.

Of course, if your primary subject isn’t the filter colour, all bets are off (and I still have to experiment with that).

But the short version is: If you’re using a filter to boost contrast by making colours darker, don’t negate that by making everything brighter.

Dante Stella has an excelent article on filters that covers this as well.

Thus ends todays lesson.

  1. B+W 090 []
  2. If I know why this is, why didn’t I do it right the first time? Because I figured out the why from looking at my mistakes, silly. That’s why I’m experimenting. []

First week

Monday, August 17th, 2009 by

Well, the first week is over. I shot about 6 rolls, most of which were `calibration shots’: bracketing like hell and checking the contact sheets for best exposure.


When scanning, I was once again surprised by the big exposure latitude of negative film. This shot was the +1 exposure from a `Sunny sixteen’ batch, and gave a better image than the real sunny sixteen exposure. Expose for the shadows, I guess. (That’ll take a while to get used to.)

Another lesson learned this week was that when Mike Johnston said to make notes, he meant it. During the calibration rolls, I made a few unbracketed shots1, guessing exposure as best as I could. In some cases, I didn’t write down what exposure I used. As Murphy dictates, those exposures were dead-on, but I have no idea what values I used…

  1. In situations where bracketing wasn’t appropriate or possible. Snapshots []

It starts

Monday, August 10th, 2009 by

Well, the Leica Lessons project has officially started. I shot my last frame of Velvia around midnight, and this morning at breakfast I loaded the first roll of Neopan into the Leica.

Today I’ll shoot a lot of `calibration’ frames, setting some base exposures for common lighting situations. I’m cheating a bit, using this chart to get a close guess for an Ev value and then bracketing 2 stops above and below that. Making notes along the way of course.

Updates

Sunday, August 9th, 2009 by

Just a quick note that I’ve added the equipment for the Leica Lessons project to the equipment pages. Details are still limited, as I haven’t actually shot anything with this stuff yet.

I’m using this weekend to finish the rolls of film left in each of my cameras, as today is the last chance to use those. I foresee a lot of business for my lab this week…